Opponents say Forest Service skirted its duties

By: Jonathan Romeo, The Durango Herald
October 16, 2017

Rendering of the Village at Wolf Creek

Rendering of the Village at Wolf Creek

The would-be developers of the controversial Village at Wolf Creek are not ready to give up.

Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture – spearheaded by Texas billionaire B.J. “Red” McCombs – has filed an appeal with the next tier of the federal court system, challenging a previous federal judge’s decision that the massive development atop Wolf Creek Pass was approved “contrary to law.”

“The Joint-Venture believes strongly the project is a good project and the Forest Service did everything it needed to do to study the environmental impacts of that project,” said Bill Leone, an attorney representing the developers. The appeal was filed Friday.

Although the timeline of the proposed Village at Wolf Creek dates back more than 30 years, this most recent spat concerns a 2015 decision by the Forest Service, in which the service approved a land swap that effectively gave the developers the access to U.S. Highway 160 it has always lacked.

For nearly three decades, the developers have sought to build a resort at the base of Wolf Creek Ski area with the capacity for anywhere between 8,000 to 10,000 people on the mountain pass, which sits at an elevation of 10,000 feet and is more than 20 miles from the nearest town.

Yet the parcel did not have access to a major road until the Forest Service decision to approve the land swap two years ago.

The Forest Service’s decision, however, was challenged by a coalition of environmental groups that say environmental impacts to the remote mountain pass were not taken into account, and that the process all along has been unduly influenced by McCombs and his political pressure.

In May, Judge Richard P. Matsch, a senior United States district judge for the District of Colorado, in no uncertain terms, agreed.

“What NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) requires is that before taking any major action, a federal agency must stop and take a careful look to determine the environmental impact of that decision, and listen to the public before taking action,” Matsch wrote in his decision. “The Forest Service failed to do that.”

In September, Matsch denied a request from Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture to reconsider the May decision.

“The Forest Service cannot abdicate its responsibility to protect the forest by making an attempt at an artful dodge,” Matsch wrote in that decision.

For the developers, there were two choices: challenge the decision with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals or restart the environmental analysis regarding a land swap with the Forest Service for access to the highway.

The appeal filed Friday now enters a briefing schedule that probably won’t start for another 30 days or so, Leavell-McCombs Joint Venture’s attorney Leone said.

The environmental coalition – known as “Friends of Wolf Creek,” comprised of Rocky Mountain Wild, San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council, San Juan Citizens Alliance and Wilderness Workshop, will also file counter-briefs.

Read more at The Durango Herald

%d bloggers like this: